Mindgard vs Promptfoo
Both compete in Red-Teaming & AI Security. Mindgard positions itself as “Continuous automated AI red teaming and security testing for enterprise AI systems”, while Promptfooleads with “Open-source tool for evaluating and red-teaming LLM apps, agents, and RAG systems”. The table below compares what each publishes.
Where Mindgard pulls ahead
Publishes support for SOC 2, which Promptfoo does not. Enterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systems
Where Promptfoo pulls ahead
Developer teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps
| Positioning | Continuous automated AI red teaming and security testing for enterprise AI systems | Open-source tool for evaluating and red-teaming LLM apps, agents, and RAG systems |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Red-Teaming & AI Security | Red-Teaming & AI Security |
| Frameworks | SOC 2 | None published |
| Deployment | SaaS, API | Open-source, SaaS, API |
| Built for | Security, Data Science / ML, Risk | Data Science / ML, Security |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Boston, USA (with London, UK office) | USA |
| Ownership | Private (VC-backed) | Acquired by OpenAI (2026); previously VC-backed |
| Funding | Over $11.6M raised, including an $8M round in December 2024 led by .406 Ventures, with IQ Capital, Lakestar, Atlantic Bridge and WillowTree Investments | ~$23.4M raised prior to acquisition; $5M seed (a16z, 2024) and $18.4M Series A led by Insight Partners (2025) |
| Pricing | Not published | Open-source (MIT license), free; paid enterprise platform |
| Key capabilities |
|
|
| Integrations | OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS, Docker, Burp Suite, CI/CD pipelines | OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, CI/CD pipelines, GitHub |
| Notable customers | None published | OpenAI, Anthropic, Fortune 500 enterprises |
| Best for | Enterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systems | Developer teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps |
| Limitations | Focused on security testing rather than broad AI governance or policy management; some framework-specific compliance mapping is not detailed publicly. | Developer-oriented and requires engineering effort to configure; broader governance/compliance features live in the paid enterprise tier. |
Which should you shortlist?
Choose Mindgard if enterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systems
Choose Promptfoo if developer teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps
Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.
AI Governance Tool Selection Kit
A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.
Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.