AIAI Governance StackFree kit

Mindgard vs Promptfoo

Both compete in Red-Teaming & AI Security. Mindgard positions itself as “Continuous automated AI red teaming and security testing for enterprise AI systems”, while Promptfooleads with “Open-source tool for evaluating and red-teaming LLM apps, agents, and RAG systems”. The table below compares what each publishes.

Where Mindgard pulls ahead

Publishes support for SOC 2, which Promptfoo does not. Enterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systems

Where Promptfoo pulls ahead

Developer teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps

PositioningContinuous automated AI red teaming and security testing for enterprise AI systemsOpen-source tool for evaluating and red-teaming LLM apps, agents, and RAG systems
CategoryRed-Teaming & AI SecurityRed-Teaming & AI Security
FrameworksSOC 2None published
DeploymentSaaS, APIOpen-source, SaaS, API
Built forSecurity, Data Science / ML, RiskData Science / ML, Security
Founded20222023
HeadquartersBoston, USA (with London, UK office)USA
OwnershipPrivate (VC-backed)Acquired by OpenAI (2026); previously VC-backed
FundingOver $11.6M raised, including an $8M round in December 2024 led by .406 Ventures, with IQ Capital, Lakestar, Atlantic Bridge and WillowTree Investments~$23.4M raised prior to acquisition; $5M seed (a16z, 2024) and $18.4M Series A led by Insight Partners (2025)
PricingNot publishedOpen-source (MIT license), free; paid enterprise platform
Key capabilities
  • Automated AI red teaming
  • AI discovery and reconnaissance
  • Attack surface mapping
  • Vulnerability assessment
  • Model scanning
  • Runtime protection
  • LLM evaluation and benchmarking
  • Automated red teaming and vulnerability scanning
  • Declarative test configs
  • Prompt and model comparison
  • CI/CD integration
  • Local/self-hosted execution
IntegrationsOpenAI, Anthropic, AWS, Docker, Burp Suite, CI/CD pipelinesOpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, CI/CD pipelines, GitHub
Notable customersNone publishedOpenAI, Anthropic, Fortune 500 enterprises
Best forEnterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systemsDeveloper teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps
LimitationsFocused on security testing rather than broad AI governance or policy management; some framework-specific compliance mapping is not detailed publicly.Developer-oriented and requires engineering effort to configure; broader governance/compliance features live in the paid enterprise tier.

Which should you shortlist?

Choose Mindgard if enterprise security teams needing continuous, attacker-perspective red teaming and testing of LLMs and AI systems

Choose Promptfoo if developer teams wanting free, open-source, CI/CD-integrated evaluation and red teaming of LLM apps

Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.

AI Governance Tool Selection Kit

A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.

Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.