Trustible vs Modulos
Both compete in Policy, Compliance & GRC. Trustible positions itself as “AI governance platform for regulated enterprises to manage risk and compliance”, while Modulosleads with “Automated AI governance and EU AI Act compliance workflow management”. The table below compares what each publishes.
Where Trustible pulls ahead
Regulated enterprises that want a focused governance platform with strong regulatory guidance and support for building internal AI literacy.
Where Modulos pulls ahead
European and EU-facing organizations that need to operationalize EU AI Act conformity and connect governance to their MLOps/LLMOps stack.
Both map to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, so framework coverage alone will not separate them — the decision usually comes down to who operates the tool and how it fits your existing stack.
| Positioning | AI governance platform for regulated enterprises to manage risk and compliance | Automated AI governance and EU AI Act compliance workflow management |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Policy, Compliance & GRC | Policy, Compliance & GRC |
| Frameworks | EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 | EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 |
| Deployment | SaaS, Cloud | SaaS, Cloud, API |
| Built for | GRC, Compliance, Risk, Legal | Compliance, Risk, GRC, Data Science / ML |
| Founded | 2023 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Arlington, USA | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Funding | $4.6M seed (2025); ~$6M+ total | CHF 8.7M pre-Series A (2025); ~CHF 16.4M total |
| Pricing | Custom / enterprise | Custom / enterprise |
| Key capabilities |
|
|
| Integrations | Cloud environments, Enterprise GRC and ticketing tools | MLOps and LLMOps tools, Auditing infrastructure, Cloud platforms |
| Notable customers | None published | None published |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that want a focused governance platform with strong regulatory guidance and support for building internal AI literacy. | European and EU-facing organizations that need to operationalize EU AI Act conformity and connect governance to their MLOps/LLMOps stack. |
| Limitations | As an early-stage company its feature depth and integration ecosystem are still expanding, and it is less oriented toward technical model testing or runtime monitoring. | Strong EU-regulatory orientation may be more than non-EU buyers require, and as a younger, smaller-funded vendor its ecosystem and reference base are still maturing. |
Which should you shortlist?
Choose Trustible if regulated enterprises that want a focused governance platform with strong regulatory guidance and support for building internal AI literacy.
Choose Modulos if european and EU-facing organizations that need to operationalize EU AI Act conformity and connect governance to their MLOps/LLMOps stack.
Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.
AI Governance Tool Selection Kit
A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.
Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.