Zenity vs Cranium AI

Both compete in Red-Teaming & AI Security. Zenity positions itself as “Security and governance platform purpose-built for AI agents across SaaS, cloud, and endpoints”, while Cranium AIleads with “End-to-end AI security and governance platform to discover, monitor, red-team and prove enterprise AI”. The table below compares what each publishes.

Where Zenity pulls ahead

Enterprises adopting AI agents and low-code platforms that need centralized security posture management and response

Where Cranium AI pulls ahead

Publishes support for EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, which Zenity does not. Enterprises that need to secure, red-team, and prove governance across internal and third-party AI in one platform

	Zenity	Cranium AI
Positioning	Security and governance platform purpose-built for AI agents across SaaS, cloud, and endpoints	End-to-end AI security and governance platform to discover, monitor, red-team and prove enterprise AI
Category	Red-Teaming & AI Security	Red-Teaming & AI Security
Frameworks	None published	EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001
Deployment	SaaS, Cloud, API	SaaS, Cloud, API
Built for	Security, Risk, GRC	Security, Risk, GRC, Compliance, Data Science / ML
Founded	2021	2023
Headquarters	Tel Aviv, Israel	Short Hills, New Jersey, USA
Ownership	Private (VC-backed)	Private (venture-backed; spun out of KPMG Studio)
Funding	$59.5M total; $38M Series B in October 2024 led by Third Point Ventures and DTCP, with M12, Intel Capital and Vertex Ventures	~$32M total; $25M Series A (Oct 2023) led by Titanium/Telstra Ventures with KPMG and SYN Ventures
Pricing	Not published	Enterprise subscription; quote-based (annual subscription also listed on Azure/Microsoft marketplaces)
Key capabilities	AI agent discovery and inventory AI security posture management Real-time threat detection and response Prompt injection and hijacking prevention Low-code/no-code app security Shadow AI visibility	AI asset discovery and AI Bill of Materials (AI-BOM) Shadow AI detection Continuous behavioral monitoring and observability Cranium Arena red-teaming (MITRE ATLAS, OWASP) Policy governance mapped to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act and ISO 42001 Runtime threat detection and remediation
Integrations	Microsoft Copilot Studio, Microsoft Power Platform, Salesforce, ServiceNow	Weights & Biases, Microsoft Azure / Azure Marketplace, MITRE ATLAS, OWASP
Notable customers	None published	None published
Best for	Enterprises adopting AI agents and low-code platforms that need centralized security posture management and response	Enterprises that need to secure, red-team, and prove governance across internal and third-party AI in one platform
Limitations	Strongest around enterprise agent/low-code ecosystems; less focused on standalone model red teaming or compliance certification.	Security- and red-teaming-first orientation means it emphasizes threat testing and monitoring over deep policy/GRC workflow; enterprise pricing is not publicly listed; still a relatively young company with limited publicly named customers.

Which should you shortlist?

Choose Zenity if enterprises adopting AI agents and low-code platforms that need centralized security posture management and response

Choose Cranium AI if enterprises that need to secure, red-team, and prove governance across internal and third-party AI in one platform

Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.

Full Zenity profile →Full Cranium AI profile →

AI Governance Tool Selection Kit

A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.

Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.