Robust Intelligence vs SplxAI
Both compete in Red-Teaming & AI Security. Robust Intelligence positions itself as “AI Firewall and automated model validation to secure AI from build to production”, while SplxAIleads with “End-to-end security for AI with automated red teaming and runtime protection for agentic systems”. The table below compares what each publishes.
Where Robust Intelligence pulls ahead
Publishes support for NIST AI RMF, which SplxAI does not. Enterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standards
Where SplxAI pulls ahead
Enterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems
| Positioning | AI Firewall and automated model validation to secure AI from build to production | End-to-end security for AI with automated red teaming and runtime protection for agentic systems |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Red-Teaming & AI Security | Red-Teaming & AI Security |
| Frameworks | NIST AI RMF | None published |
| Deployment | SaaS, On-prem, API | SaaS, API, Open-source |
| Built for | Security, Data Science / ML, Risk | Security, Data Science / ML, GRC |
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, USA | Dover, Delaware, USA |
| Ownership | Acquired by Cisco (2024, reported ~$400M); now part of Cisco AI Defense | Acquired by Zscaler (2025) |
| Funding | ~$44M raised prior to acquisition; valued above $200M | ~$9M total; $7M seed in March 2025 led by LauncHub Ventures |
| Pricing | Enterprise licensing (now sold within Cisco AI Defense) | Not published |
| Key capabilities |
|
|
| Integrations | Cisco Security Cloud / AI Defense, Major LLM providers, ML pipelines and model registries | MCP servers, GitHub |
| Notable customers | None published | None published |
| Best for | Enterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standards | Enterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems |
| Limitations | Absorbed into Cisco, so it is increasingly delivered as Cisco AI Defense rather than a standalone product; enterprise-oriented, less accessible to small teams | Now part of Zscaler, so standalone availability and roadmap are tied to the acquirer; detailed compliance certifications not publicly enumerated. |
Which should you shortlist?
Choose Robust Intelligence if enterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standards
Choose SplxAI if enterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems
Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.
AI Governance Tool Selection Kit
A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.
Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.