AIAI Governance StackFree kit

Robust Intelligence vs SplxAI

Both compete in Red-Teaming & AI Security. Robust Intelligence positions itself as “AI Firewall and automated model validation to secure AI from build to production”, while SplxAIleads with “End-to-end security for AI with automated red teaming and runtime protection for agentic systems”. The table below compares what each publishes.

Where Robust Intelligence pulls ahead

Publishes support for NIST AI RMF, which SplxAI does not. Enterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standards

Where SplxAI pulls ahead

Enterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems

PositioningAI Firewall and automated model validation to secure AI from build to productionEnd-to-end security for AI with automated red teaming and runtime protection for agentic systems
CategoryRed-Teaming & AI SecurityRed-Teaming & AI Security
FrameworksNIST AI RMFNone published
DeploymentSaaS, On-prem, APISaaS, API, Open-source
Built forSecurity, Data Science / ML, RiskSecurity, Data Science / ML, GRC
Founded20192023
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, USADover, Delaware, USA
OwnershipAcquired by Cisco (2024, reported ~$400M); now part of Cisco AI DefenseAcquired by Zscaler (2025)
Funding~$44M raised prior to acquisition; valued above $200M~$9M total; $7M seed in March 2025 led by LauncHub Ventures
PricingEnterprise licensing (now sold within Cisco AI Defense)Not published
Key capabilities
  • AI Firewall runtime input/output protection
  • Algorithmic red teaming
  • Automated model validation and stress-testing
  • Prompt-injection and jailbreak defense
  • OWASP LLM and MITRE ATLAS mapping
  • Continuous production monitoring
  • Automated red teaming
  • AI asset management and discovery
  • Runtime input/output guardrails
  • Dynamic prompt hardening
  • Governance and compliance mapping
  • Agentic Radar open-source scanner
IntegrationsCisco Security Cloud / AI Defense, Major LLM providers, ML pipelines and model registriesMCP servers, GitHub
Notable customersNone publishedNone published
Best forEnterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standardsEnterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems
LimitationsAbsorbed into Cisco, so it is increasingly delivered as Cisco AI Defense rather than a standalone product; enterprise-oriented, less accessible to small teamsNow part of Zscaler, so standalone availability and roadmap are tied to the acquirer; detailed compliance certifications not publicly enumerated.

Which should you shortlist?

Choose Robust Intelligence if enterprise security and ML risk teams wanting adversarial testing plus runtime protection mapped to AI-security standards

Choose SplxAI if enterprises wanting full-stack AI security from red teaming through runtime protection for agentic systems

Neither is a substitute for a governance program. Whichever you pick, you still need people who can define the policies the tool enforces.

AI Governance Tool Selection Kit

A vendor-comparison worksheet plus EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 requirement checklists — so you can shortlist tools against the obligations that actually apply to you.

Free. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.